Changes to Occupancy Agreements in Wales
Cathryn Vallender • April 12, 2022

Changes for occupancy agreements in Wales – Important update


The long-awaited Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 is almost here. Much time has passed since it obtained royal assent in January 2016. Implementation is just around the corner, on 15 July 2022.


Aims of the Act

The aim of the Act is to simplify the process in Wales, replacing several pieces of current legislation. It also seeks to provide clarity and flexibility around the legal framework. It also marks a clear divergence from the approach in England.

 

There will be two types of contracts: a standard contract for private rented landlord and a secure contract for community landlords (social landlords). New contracts will need be in place by 15 January 2023.


Changes being delivered

There is a significant shift in language with tenancies now referred to as ‘occupation contracts’ and tenants as ‘contract holders.’  However, there is much more to the Act than a change in language. We set out some of those changes below:


Written contracts are compulsory

Tenants or licensees are now referred to as ‘contract holders’ and they must have a written contract setting out key information around rights and responsibilities. The Act provides two model contract agreements, one for fixed term contracts and one for periodic contracts. Interestingly, most of the clauses within these model contracts are mandatory.

 

A landlord must provide the occupation contracts within 14 days of the tenancy commencing.  If they do not, the contract holder will be legally entitled to withhold or reclaim the rent payable for the period they are without an occupation contract.

 

Provision to tackle retaliatory evictions

The Act allows provision for the Court to refuse to make a possession order, should the court be satisfied that the landlord is seeking such an order to avoid compliance with obligations under the Renting Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) (Wales) Regulations 2022.  


Changes to a ‘no fault’ ground for possession

The Act has included the provision of a ‘no fault’ eviction notice. However, it is much more favourable to the contract holder than the current provisions under Section 21 of the Housing Act 1988. Also, it only applies to private contracts and community/social landlords cannot use a ‘no fault’ notice.


If you are engaged in current section 21 proceedings at the date of implementation you can continue on that basis. However, after the 15 July 2022, social landlords will not be able to obtain possession using a no-fault ground. The Act has been designed to encourage landlords to rely upon the most appropriate ground for possession and allow the ‘contract holder’ the ability to defend such an application should they feel that it is unfair.


The private landlord can bring a periodic standard contact to an end by giving the contract holder not less than 6 months’ notice. Furthermore, the notice cannot be served in the first six months of the contract. This affords the contract holder a guaranteed 12-month occupation under a periodic contract. Also landlords cannot serve another ‘no-fault’ notice within 6 months of any previous one.


There are transitional provisions which apply different notice periods for existing tenants. For example, existing tenancies that become periodic contracts holders once the Act comes into force will retain a notice period of a minimum of two months, with notice not being allowed to be given in the first four months of the contract.


Other notice periods

On the grounds of anti-social behaviour, you will still be able to issue proceedings immediately after the notice is served. On the grounds of non-payment of rent, you may issue proceedings one month after the notice is served or if the arrears are more than 2 months’ rent liability, after 14 days of the notice being served.


There are some changes to other grounds for possession too. No provision has been brought forward for many of the mandatory grounds which currently exist in Schedule 2 of the Housing Act 1988.


Fitness for Human Habitation (Wales) Regulations 2022

The Act brings into force the Fitness for Human Habitation Act (Wales) Regulation 2022 upon implementation. One key change here is to electrical safety condition report.


From the 15 July 2022,  the Act makes it a requirement that the landlord has an electrical safety report. The report can last up to a maximum of five years and will apply to all new occupation contracts after implementation.


For those tenancies that existed prior to the 15 July 2022, the Landlord will have 12 months to comply with these new regulations.


Changes made to the contract and right of succession

The Act is more flexible than the current provision in making changes to the contract, with changes to the contract holder being easier to make, with no new agreement needing to be put in place.


The right of succession on the death of the contract holder is provided for, however, it can be expressly excluded.


Next steps

As the implementation date approaches all landlords should start to review their tenancies held in Wales and ensure careful drafting on new occupation contracts to ensure compliance. Planning should also begin in transitioning existing tenancies over to occupation contracts in order to meet the January 2023 deadline. 


February 26, 2025
What the Crime and Policing Bill has in store for ASB and Housing Providers
January 23, 2025
Are you prepared for Awaab's law?
By Joseph Warren October 21, 2024
Is an exceptional level of RPI good reason to depart from an increase in pitch fees at that level? – Mobile Homes Act 1983
By Daryl Bigwood October 14, 2024
Cobb Warren were recently successful in an appeal against the decision of a District Judge to refuse an application to include a positive requirement in an injunction pursuant to Part 1 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 ("the 2014 Act"). This took place in October in front of a Circuit Judge in the County Court at Bristol. Our client sought to include a provision requiring the respondent to engage with support services to help address the underlying causes of the anti-social behaviour the respondent engaged in. The District Judge at first instance refused the application on the basis that such an order would amount to an order of mandamus (orders of mandamus have, since 2004, been known as ‘mandatory orders’ - they are specific to public law matters) and therefore, pursuant to section 38 of the County Courts Act 1984. The District Judge said that the County Court lacked jurisdiction to make such an order. The appeal was argued on two points: 1. The order was not an order of mandamus (or mandatory order) as such orders are remedies in public law proceedings only and not private law proceedings; or 2. In any event, even if it were, the 2014 Act creates a separate statutory scheme which enables the County Court to include any positive requirements in an injunction in order to prevent the respondent from engaging in anti-social behaviour. The Circuit Judge hearing the appeal allowed the appeal on both grounds. In respects of the second ground, we advanced an argument that the decision in Swindon Borough Council v Abrook [2024] EWCA Civ 221 supported the ground as: 1. The Court of Appeal determined that the Court’s usual case management powers to vary or set aside an order of its own volition did not apply to injunctions under the 2014 Act. This was therefore indicative of the 2014 Act creating its own statutory scheme. 2. The Court of Appeal was considering an appeal from the decision of a District Judge in the County Court and determined, at paragraph 109 of that earlier judgment that a Court should consider making positive requirements. Therefore, the Court of Appeal seemingly accepted that positive requirements were available in the County Court. Overall, we achieved a good outcome for our client and obtained clarity as to the use of positive requirements. Such requirements can often be more effective in addressing anti-social behaviour, by addressing the causes of the behaviour, rather than simply prohibiting the behaviour itself. A review of the Court's powers in relation to Anti-Social Behaviour by the Civil Justice Council in 2020 emphasised the importance of including positive requirements in injunctions. One of its recommendation was to increase their use as a way of addressing underlying issue causing Anti-Social Behaviour. If you need to discuss the above case or require any guidance please get in touch with us.
September 12, 2024
Newsflash - Renters' Rights Bill 2024 
By Joseph Warren August 7, 2024
Responding to the riots: what powers do Housing Associations have?
By Joseph Warren July 15, 2024
Recent CobbWarren court success clarifies the position on Access Injunctions
October 19, 2023
The Chambers UK Legal Guide 2024 was released today – with a familiar name making its debut appearance.
Show More